Understanding Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act - 45 Day MSME Payment Rule and Disallowance of Expenses Due to Non-payment to MSMEs

Machine Tools Manufacturing Unit

The Finance Act, 2023 introduced a significant amendment to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by adding clause (h). This new clause aims to address the timely payment issues faced by Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) in India. Here's a detailed look into the background, implications, and specific details of this amendment.

Background and Rationale

Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) are crucial to the Indian economy, contributing significantly to employment and GDP. However, these enterprises often face delayed payments from buyers, causing cash flow issues and financial strain. The existing provisions under the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006, mandate buyers to make payments within a specified period or face penal interest. Despite this, delays were common, prompting the need for stricter measures.

To enforce discipline and ensure timely payments to MSEs, the Finance Act, 2023, introduced Section 43B(h) into the Income Tax Act. This amendment disallows the deduction of expenses incurred towards MSEs if the payment exceeds the stipulated period under the MSMED Act, thereby encouraging prompt payments.

Key Provisions of Section 43B(h)

Section 43B(h) specifically targets payments made to micro or small enterprises beyond the prescribed time limits. According to the MSMED Act, payments to MSMEs as a rule should be made within 15 days if no specific period is agreed upon, or within the agreed period, not exceeding 45 days. If the buyer fails to comply, the following consequences apply under the Income Tax Act:

1. Disallowance of Deduction: Any payment made to micro or small enterprises beyond the stipulated period will not be allowed as a deduction in the previous year in which the liability is incurred. Instead, the deduction will only be allowed in the year in which the actual payment is made.

2. Non-Applicability of General Provisions: Unlike other expenses under Section 43B, which can be claimed if paid before the due date of filing the return, this provision does not apply to payments under clause (h). The deduction is strictly disallowed if the payment terms of the MSMED Act are violated.

Coverage and Exceptions

The amendment applies exclusively to micro and small enterprises as defined under the MSMED Act. The definitions are as follows:

- Micro Enterprises: Enterprises with an investment in plant and machinery or equipment not exceeding ₹1 crore and an annual turnover not exceeding ₹5 crores.

- Small Enterprises: Enterprises with an investment in plant and machinery or equipment not exceeding ₹10 crores and an annual turnover not exceeding ₹50 crores.

It's important to note that medium enterprises are not covered under this amendment. Additionally, traders are explicitly excluded from the benefits of the MSMED Act, and hence, the provisions of Section 43B(h) do not apply to them.

Impact on MSMEs

The amendment aims to improve the financial health of micro and small enterprises by ensuring they receive timely payments. The immediate impact on MSMEs includes:

Improved Cash Flow: Timely payments will alleviate cash flow issues, enabling better financial planning and operational efficiency.

Reduced Financial Stress: Avoiding delays in payments reduces the financial stress on MSEs, potentially lowering the dependency on credit and reducing interest costs.

In the short term, MSEs can expect a significant improvement in their operational liquidity, allowing them to reinvest in their businesses and enhance productivity. This change is particularly beneficial for enterprises that rely on steady cash flow to meet their working capital requirements. Additionally, timely payments can help these enterprises avoid taking on high-interest short-term loans to cover operational expenses, thus reducing their overall financial burden.

Practical Scenarios and Compliance

To comply with Section 43B(h), taxpayers and auditors need to be vigilant about the payment timelines. For instance, if a taxpayer receives goods or services from an MSE on June 15, 2023, and the agreed payment period is 45 days, payment must be made by July 30, 2023, to claim the expense in the same financial year. Delays beyond this period will result in disallowance until the payment is made.

Auditors must ensure that sundry creditors' outstanding balances as of March 31 are reviewed to confirm that no payments due to MSEs are beyond the permissible period. This scrutiny is necessary to avoid disallowances and ensure accurate tax reporting.

Reporting by Auditors in Form 3CD

The reporting of compliance with Section 43B(h) is an essential part of the tax audit process, and auditors play a crucial role in ensuring that businesses adhere to the stipulated timelines. This compliance is reported in Form 3CD, which is the statement of particulars required to be furnished under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act.

Clause 26 of Form 3CD specifically deals with the reporting of unpaid amounts covered under Section 43B, which now includes clause (h). The following steps outline how auditors are expected to report these details:

Identification of Micro and Small Enterprises: Auditors need to identify all creditors classified as micro or small enterprises under the MSMED Act. This can be done by reviewing declarations provided by the suppliers or through confirmations obtained directly from the suppliers.

Verification of Payment Timelines: Auditors must verify the payment terms agreed upon between the taxpayer and the MSEs. They should ensure that these terms do not exceed the 45-day period as stipulated by the MSMED Act.

Scrutiny of Payment Records: Auditors should scrutinize the payment records to check if payments have been made within the agreed timelines. Any payments made beyond the stipulated period should be noted.

Disallowance Reporting: For any payments made beyond the permissible period, auditors need to report these amounts under Clause 26 of Form 3CD, specifying that the amounts are disallowed under Section 43B(h). They must also mention the year in which the actual payment was made, if applicable, to indicate when the deduction can be claimed.

Auditors' Comments

Auditors are required to provide detailed comments on their findings related to Section 43B(h) compliance. These comments should include:

• Instances of Non-Compliance: Detailed instances where the payments to MSEs were not made within the stipulated period.

• Impact on Tax Computation: The impact of these disallowances on the tax computation of the taxpayer.

  
  

• Recommendations for Improvement: Suggestions for improving compliance, such as implementing better payment tracking systems or renegotiating payment terms with MSEs to ensure they fall within the allowable period.

By meticulously documenting these details, auditors help ensure transparency and accuracy in the reporting process, thereby aiding the taxpayer in avoiding potential penalties and ensuring compliance with the law.

Stakeholder Perspectives

Government

From the government’s perspective, the introduction of Section 43B(h) is a step towards formalizing and ensuring discipline in the payment ecosystem. By disallowing deductions for delayed payments, the government aims to instill a sense of responsibility among larger enterprises and other buyers to adhere to payment terms, thus fostering a healthier economic environment.

The government also expects that this amendment will reduce the burden on the legal system, where numerous cases of payment delays often end up, by incentivizing timely settlements. This could lead to a more efficient legal process and less cluttered court dockets.

Businesses

For businesses, especially larger companies, this amendment necessitates a reassessment of their payment cycles and financial management practices. Companies that rely on extended credit periods from their suppliers will need to reconsider their cash flow strategies to ensure compliance with the new regulations.

While this could initially cause some strain, especially for businesses accustomed to longer payment cycles, the overall impact is expected to be positive. By promoting a culture of timely payments, businesses can build stronger, more trustworthy relationships with their MSE suppliers, potentially leading to better terms and cooperation in the long run.

Micro and Small Enterprises

For MSEs, this amendment is a much-needed relief. It not only ensures that they receive timely payments but also boosts their confidence in dealing with larger enterprises. The assurance of timely payments can significantly impact their growth trajectories, allowing them to focus on scaling operations rather than worrying about cash flow issues.

Additionally, the amendment indirectly promotes better financial discipline within MSEs as well, as they will have a more predictable inflow of funds to manage their expenses and investments.

Financial Institutions

Banks and financial institutions might see a reduced demand for short-term working capital loans from MSEs as a result of improved cash flows. This could lead to a shift in how financial products are tailored and offered to MSEs, focusing more on growth and expansion rather than immediate liquidity needs.

Potential Challenges and Recommendations

While the amendment brings numerous benefits, it also presents certain challenges:

Administrative Burden: Businesses might face an increased administrative burden to ensure compliance with the new payment timelines. Proper record-keeping and timely reconciliations will be crucial.

Cash Flow Management: Businesses that are used to extended credit periods might face cash flow management challenges, necessitating better financial planning and possibly renegotiating payment terms with their own clients.

Awareness and Training: Ensuring that all stakeholders, including auditors and financial managers, are aware of the new provisions and understand the compliance requirements will be essential. This might involve training sessions and updates to existing financial systems and processes.

To address these challenges, the following recommendations can be considered:

• Implementing Robust Payment Systems: Businesses should invest in robust payment and accounting systems that can track and manage payment cycles effectively.

• Regular Training: Businesses should conduct regular training sessions for finance teams and auditors to ensure they are up-to-date with the latest amendments and compliance requirements.

• Stakeholder Communication: Businesses should maintain clear communication with their MSE suppliers to ensure mutual understanding and agreement on payment terms.

  
  

• Financial Planning: Businesses should revisit their financial planning strategies to accommodate the new payment timelines, possibly by building in buffer periods for payment processing.

Conclusion

The introduction of Section 43B(h) is a critical step towards safeguarding the interests of micro and small enterprises in India. By mandating timely payments, this amendment not only supports the financial stability of MSEs but also fosters a culture of prompt payment. Businesses and auditors must adapt to these changes to ensure compliance and avoid potential disallowances.

Looking ahead, if successfully implemented Section 43B(h) could set a precedent for further reforms aimed at supporting the MSME sector. Continuous evaluation of the amendment's impact and feedback from stakeholders will be essential in refining and enhancing the provisions to better serve the needs of micro and small enterprises.

As stakeholders across the spectrum adjust to these changes, the long-term benefits of a more disciplined and reliable payment ecosystem will become increasingly evident, paving the way for a more robust and resilient economy.